Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00057
Original file (BC 2014 00057.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00057

					COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1. His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. 

2.  He be awarded Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm medals. (Administratively corrected).


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was unjustly discharged.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

According to the applicant's military personnel records, he initially entered the Regular Air Force on 02 Oct 85 and served on active duty until 28 Apr 92 when he was furnished an general (under honorable conditions) discharge for misconduct - pattern of conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline.  He was credited with 6 years, 6 months, and 27 days of total active service.  A copy of the applicant's discharge package is not available; therefore the exact circumstances that precipitated his discharge could not be verified.

On an unspecified date in May 2014, AFPC/DPSID determined the applicant’s entitlement to the Southwest Asia Service Medal with two Bronze Stars, Kuwait Liberation Medal – Saudi Arabia, and the Kuwait Liberation Medal - Kuwait and corrected his records administratively (Exhibit C).

On 21 Jul 14, a request for post-service information was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing.  Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority.  The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses committed.  In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, in the absence of any evidence related to the applicant’s post-service activities, we could not determine if such consideration is warranted.  We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility has verified the applicant’s entitlement to the Southwest Asia Service Medal with two Bronze Stars, Kuwait Liberation Medal – Saudi Arabia, and the Kuwait Liberation Medal - Kuwait and corrected his records administratively.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting relief beyond that rendered administratively.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00057 in Executive Session on 21 Nov 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 21 Jan 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSO, dated May 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 21 Jul 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05838

    Original file (BC 2012 05838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the KLM-SA, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05838

    Original file (BC 2012 05838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the KLM-SA, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01046

    Original file (BC 2014 01046.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01046 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following awards and decorations: Kuwait Liberation Medal-Saudi Arabia (KLM-SA) Kuwait Liberation Medal-Kuwait (KLM-K) Southwest Asia Service Medal with three Bronze Service Stars (SWASM, w/3 BSSs). The SWASM is awarded to members of the United States Armed Forces who served in support of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02329

    Original file (BC 2013 02329.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the AFOUA w/V, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, there was no official evidence showing the applicant was attached or assigned to a unit that received the award. Additionally, in view of the fact that we have determined that there is sufficient evidence to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00543

    Original file (BC 2014 00543.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00543 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to reflect the following awards: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which are included at Exhibit C. AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9900364

    Original file (9900364.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Exhibit B. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 9 Jun 99, w/BCMR response. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR 99-00364 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00271

    Original file (BC-2003-00271.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00271 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to show that he was awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) and/or the Kuwait Liberation Medal. Although the LANTIRN system is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01460

    Original file (BC-2011-01460.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) verified the applicant was credited with Foreign Service from 1 Jan 91 to 30 Jun 91; however, they were unable to determine what country the applicant served in during this time frame. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was awarded the Kuwait Liberation Medal – Saudi...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02154

    Original file (BC 2014 02154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 May 11, the applicant officially changed his name. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: SAF/MR memorandum, Guidance to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, dated 9 Mar 15, states that while the AFBCMR generally has the authority to correct an applicant’s records to reflect a legal change in the applicant’s name, it should exercise discretion is doing so. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice with respect...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00721

    Original file (BC-2012-00721.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 Sep 12, AFPC/DPSOR notified the applicant that IAW AFI 36- 3202, Separation Documents they cannot add the statement “Vietnam Era Veteran” to his DD Form 214; however, his Kuwait Liberation Medal has been amended to read Kuwait Liberation Medal-Kuwait (KLM-K) and will be administratively corrected. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his name in his military personnel...